Answer:
-6 + 3x = -9

-----------------------------

And 6 to both sides:

-----------------------------

3x = -3

-----------------------------

Divide by 3 on both sides:

-----------------------------

x = -1

-----------------------------

**Answer: x = -1**

-----------------------------

-----------------------------

And 6 to both sides:

-----------------------------

3x = -3

-----------------------------

Divide by 3 on both sides:

-----------------------------

x = -1

-----------------------------

-----------------------------

What is the solution of | x + 5 | > 7

Which of the following is equivalent to 2 2/5

I will really appreciate the help because i’m stuck and need this as soon as possible This problem uses the notion that to find the closest distance from a point to a line we need the perpendicular line joining them. The idea is that the plane is heading in some direction, if we treat the takeoff point as the origin (0,0), we can make an equation of a line to the destination. Then we need to take the slope of that line, find its negative reciprocal to build a perpendicular slope, and then use that new perpendicular slope and the point where the mountain is to make a NEW line. Then we find the intersection of these two lines, a system of equations, (preferably by an algebraic process like substitution or elimination) to find the time at which the plane will be closest to the mountain on its path toward its destination. the problem: You're flying from Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) to an undisclosed location 245 km south and 237 km east. Mt. Rainier is located approximately 56 km east and 40 km south of JBLM. If you are flying at a constant speed of 800km / hr how long after you depart JBLM will you be the closest to Mt. Rainier? ______minutes

How many vertices does a hexagonal prism have?

Prove that if a,b and c are odd integers such that a + b +c = 0, then abc < 0. (you are permitted to use well-known properties of integers here.) be sure to show all work.

Which of the following is equivalent to 2 2/5

I will really appreciate the help because i’m stuck and need this as soon as possible This problem uses the notion that to find the closest distance from a point to a line we need the perpendicular line joining them. The idea is that the plane is heading in some direction, if we treat the takeoff point as the origin (0,0), we can make an equation of a line to the destination. Then we need to take the slope of that line, find its negative reciprocal to build a perpendicular slope, and then use that new perpendicular slope and the point where the mountain is to make a NEW line. Then we find the intersection of these two lines, a system of equations, (preferably by an algebraic process like substitution or elimination) to find the time at which the plane will be closest to the mountain on its path toward its destination. the problem: You're flying from Joint Base Lewis-McChord (JBLM) to an undisclosed location 245 km south and 237 km east. Mt. Rainier is located approximately 56 km east and 40 km south of JBLM. If you are flying at a constant speed of 800km / hr how long after you depart JBLM will you be the closest to Mt. Rainier? ______minutes

How many vertices does a hexagonal prism have?

Prove that if a,b and c are odd integers such that a + b +c = 0, then abc < 0. (you are permitted to use well-known properties of integers here.) be sure to show all work.

**Answer:**

And we want to scale vertically this parabola by a factor of 7. So then we need to multiply our function by the factor:

And then function would be:

**Step-by-step explanation:**

For this case we have the original function given by:

And we want to scale vertically this parabola by a factor of 7. So then we need to multiply our function by the factor:

And then function would be:

**Answer:**

The Awnser Is C

**Step-by-step explanation:**

Hope This Helps! Have A Great Day

**Answer:**

I think it Is C 6..??

**Step-by-step explanation:**

I could me wrong IM srry also srry for late respond

$

**Answer: 1902.36**

**Step-by-step explanation:**

When interest is compounded monthly , the formula to find the accumulated amount is

, where P = principal value , r = rate of interest , t = time.

As per given,

r= 24% = 0.24

P= $1500

t= 1 year

Put all value in formula , we get

**Hence, he need to pay $1902.36.**

H0: μ = 30,

Ha: ≠30

at the significance level of 0.01.

You conclude:

a) There is not enough evidence to support the claim.

b) There is enough evidence to support the claim.

Answer:

The correct option is a

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The population mean is

The standard deviation is

The sample size is n = 9

The null hypothesis is

The alternative hypothesis is

The level of significance is

The sample mean is

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=>

=>

From the z table the area under the normal curve to the right corresponding to 1.2 is

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

=>

=>

From the value obtained w can see that

hence

The decision rule is

Fail to reject the null hypothesis

The conclusion is there is not enough evidence to support the claim

To test the hypotheses, use a one-sample** t-test** to compare the sample mean to the population mean. Calculate the t-value and compare it to the critical t-value at the significance level of 0.01. If the calculated t-value falls within the critical region, reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

To test the hypotheses, we can use a one-sample t-test since we know the population standard deviation and the sample size is small. The null **hypothesis** (H0) is that the population mean (μ) is equal to 30 seconds, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that the population mean is not equal to 30 seconds.

Using the given information, we can calculate the t-value by using the formula:

t = (sample mean - **population mean**) / (population standard deviation / sqrt(sample size))

Once we have the t-value, we can compare it to the critical t-value at the significance level of 0.01. If the calculated t-value falls within the critical region, we reject the null hypothesis. If not, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough **evidence **to support the claim.

#SPJ11

7x = 42

**Answer:**

x = 6

**Step-by-step explanation:**

**Answer:**

x=6

**Step-by-step explanation:**

7x=42

X divided by 7 and 42 divided by 7 gives you

x=6

**Answer:**

a = -2 or a = -5

**Step-by-step explanation:**

We want . We can subtract 2 from both sides of this equation to get . We can factor this to get that . When the product of two numbers is equal to zero, one of the numbers must be equal to zero. This means that either a + 2 = 0, in which case a = -2, or a + 5 = 0, in which case a = -5.